When the T5 was introduced, many users-me included-ranted about its plastic case. The people on the “dark” side couldn’t understand our fears-PocketPC’s usually don’t ship in metal cases.
Most users like metal cases for two reasons:

  • Sturdyness
    While the IIIc had heat and stability problems with its plastic housings, the m5 and V series usually survive falling 30cm and more. Also, a metal case can stand higher temperarures then a plastic one.
  • Design
    Face it-metal housings usually look nicer then stock plastic ones. In addition, plastic has more of a cheap touch-something palm user’s eyes are not glad to accept.

However-now come the weaknesses

  • Weight and Cost
    Well, usually a metal case is more expensive and heavier then a plastic case. While I do not have exact figures here, I have already touched and carried metal and plastic bars at my technical schools. And trust me, the metal bars were way heavier…
  • Icyness
    And here we have the main reason why I loath my T3 sometimes. In austria, things can get uncomfortably cold, down to more than -10 degrees centigrade. While a plastic housing does not really conduct warmth/coldness-the metal housing does. Oh boy, you can’t imagine how my hands froze to the old m505 in Winter sometimes.

That was a quick lineup of pros and cons. However, now it is YOUR TURN. Visitor-what do you prefer? Metal or Plastic-the (anonymous) comment casts the vote!

Recently, a defective Psion Revo made it into my hands. I could reanimate it for five minutes and was heavily impressed by its applications(Word even handled Styles). The most interesting feature was the printing support-built right into the OS.
At its time, IR capable printers were rare, thus uses were limited.
Lets now end the time travel. Nowadays, most handhelds have integrated bluetooth or even WLAN. It is very easy to connect to a printer(or a printer share) nowadays-and printing is one of the essential business operations. As handhelds begin to become notebook-replacements, users will want an easy, well-supported printing facility.
Currently, some developers already react to the trend and either gang up with print products that need to be purchased seperately(DocsToGo with Printboy,…) or integrate their own solution(RepliGo). Thus, users can print-if they really want to. However, some problems arise due to this plethora of systems. People wanting to print need to install, purchase and configure many different applications, leading to annoyance. Developers will need to consider the different printing utilities, and eventually redesign their print codes as print helpers get discontinued.
Now compare this to an integrated solution. Developers don’t need to worry about selecting a printing solution, and users only need to configure one application. In addition, driver development can be controlled and regulated at a central location(only one knowledge center for manufacturers), leading to a better driver selection.
It may be more work for PalmSource, but it will pay out on the long run.

Hi,
I contacted Ed Hardy about the story yesterday-and he sent the following answer:

The company we’re doing the survey for has already filled its quota of Palm OS users, which is why we’re not asking for any more.

-Ed

Now, I myself visited the survey, and ttried to enter some data. the reply I got can be seen here:

Survey.com thanks you for your interest in this study. Unfortunately, we have already filled our response quota for your segment. We do appreciate your willingness to participate and, as promised, upon entering your contact information below, you will be entered into the drawing to win $500. Thank you for your time and your opinions!

Seems like the story is cleared, a big sorry goes out to BrightHand’s staff for doing them unjustice…

UPDATE-Story was a wrong assumtion. Find full coverage here:
http://tamspalm.blogspot.com/2005/01/brighthand-story-solved.html

Well, I recently had an article mentioned at the PalmInfoCenter. Since I was not the original source, quite a lot of people were buzzing about how the PalmInfoCenter was unfair and not integre. Everybody says that Brighthand is better, etc.
While this may be true for the forums and the quality of the comments, BrightHand is not always correct either. Lets take a look at this article:
http://www.brighthand.com/article/survey2005
Brighthand states that

Do you own an HP iPAQ or Dell Axim Pocket PC? How about a Blackberry or other type of smartphone (e.g. O2, Nokia, Samsung, Motorola, Sprint PPC, Orange SPV)?

These users are invited to join a survey. I tested the survey and found out that Palm OS handhelds are accepted too. But why didn’t Brighthand mention them then?
Of course, the Brighthand staff will now say that it was only a misinterpretation, but I am not 100% sure about this. Hopsting a web portal is very expensive, and a few extra bucks are always gladly accepted(I wouldn’t mind about a donation either;-)).
When Palm OS users don’t join this survey, it will look as if the Palm OS was steadily declining-good News for RIM, PocketPC and Symbian. Microsoft has attempted the same strategy when Linux was concerned, and nowadays, companies do much to increase their market share!
Now that Brighthand isn’t the always-correct source of information anymore, what can one do? I seriously don’t know-but as always, will keep on reading multiple portals to get as many views as possible… .
BTW, I mailed Brighthand about the story and will publish their reaction here!
Tell me what you think!

Some PalmOS API functions require pointers to structures. Usually, this is a standard operation-until APIs start calculating and returning junk.
Lets take the following piece of code as an example. It is a time limiter that lets a beta expire after a defined day, or rather on a fixed date.
DateTimeType date;
date.day=2;
date.month=2;
date.year=2005;
if(TimGetSeconds()>TimDateTimeToSeconds(&date))
{
FrmCustomAlert(1000,"Beta Period expired!!n", " "," ");
return 222;
}

Looks perfect-doesn’t it? Common sense finds no error. In tests, the routine didn’t work well. The program did not expire at the date specified, but rather at a random date a few years later. After rewriting the code for a few times, the structure was nulled out. And alas, the code worked well(see below)
DateTimeType date;
date.minute=0;//All Values must be defined!!!
date.second=0;
date.hour=0;
date.day=2;
date.month=2;
date.year=2005;
if(TimGetSeconds()>TimDateTimeToSeconds(&date))
{
FrmCustomAlert(1000,"Beta Period expired!!n", " "," ");
return 222;
}

As we all know, C compilers do not initialize local variables while they are declared. Thus, random values were contained in the hour, minute and second fields, each of which was defined as a UInt16(I don’t know why->waste of memory without apparent bonus in simplicity). Thus, values of up to 2^16 could be contained. The API did not check for the sanity of the input, and thus the displacement occurred.
Discussing the matter with the developer community, three possibilities for nulling out structures emerged. The first one was used in the example above. Although it works well and makes a nice, fast fix, most programmers will prefer a tidier way of duking it out with the structure.
A more advanced way of programming would be the use of structure constants. ANSI C allows the programmer to preload structures with definite values. You just use a list of elements, like shown in the example below:
struct{
int a;
int b;
int c;}foo;
foo={ValueA, ValueB, ValueC};

As you see, each structure element can have a value assigned-if the types match. If there are less values than struct elements, the ones defined first get values, and the rest stays undefined.
However, this solution still has a disadvantage. Every type of struct needs a different list.
The ultimate solution is the use of the MemSet function. If you aren’t familiar with the call, look it up here.
If you now have a structure foo and want to zero it out, all you need is a call to
MemSet(&foo,sizeof(foo),0);
This can be packed into a parameterized macro if you plan to use it a lot. Use the pre-processor, you paid for it after all!

UPDATE-when zeroing out structures, think about what the caller expects to find there… . You an provoke a fatal alert easily.

The vienniese PalmUserGroup meets at the first thursday of each month. Ideas are shared and devices are tested-keep on reading for a short report and lots of photos from the event!

This time, we met in a Pub called Bieramt for a last time. It served the PUG well for almost a year, but staff recently got cocky(e.g. calling me Mr.Palm, being slow, giving cheeky answers, ignoring drink orders,…). Thus, a new meeting spot had to be found-the members shall soon be notified about it. Well, I was there late by a few minutes(I had to write the TE2 article), and immediately bumped into Alex, our coordinator. He proudly presented his latest achievements-a Tungsten C purchased for 240€ with a memory card and an old Treo 270. In return, he was treated to my Palm Vii and stowaway keyboard prototypes-reviews with more images are coming soon. These two circulated among the users on the meeting, along with my SX1, the TE2 article and the advertising stuff I showed in my blog a few days ago(card and magazine).
Eventually, other users trickled in, having a total of two TT2s, three TT3′s, a TC, a V, a Treo 270, a Zire 71 and a Vii accompanied by a huge pile of different mobile phones. These little gadgets provided us with lots of ranting opportunities-we spent like half an hour debugging different configurations(SX1 dials as Nokia 3650, but no SMS).
After that, most problems were solved and the rest was given up.
we then proceeded to swapping different kinds of software using memory cards, Bluetooth and infrared as appropriate. We discussed ideas and problems of the platform in a more or less familiar way. It was very interesting and all the members are already looking forward to the next meeting in February.

How are the PUG’s in your area? Is there one? Please comment!

Scroll down for a few pretty bad photos(the SX1 isn’t all that good in dim light)
Foto%2803%29 Vienniese PUG met on the 6,1,2005 TamsPalm readers get informed
Me and Alex, the chairman of the PUG
Foto Vienniese PUG met on the 6,1,2005 TamsPalm readers get informed
Alex looking at the StowAway prototype
Foto%2801%29 Vienniese PUG met on the 6,1,2005 TamsPalm readers get informed
The Palm Vii prototype next to a Palm V-on protective rag(spilt beer…)
Foto%2821%29 Vienniese PUG met on the 6,1,2005 TamsPalm readers get informed
A comrade using his T3
Foto%2820%29 Vienniese PUG met on the 6,1,2005 TamsPalm readers get informed
Comparing alu and metal hard cases
Foto%2817%29 Vienniese PUG met on the 6,1,2005 TamsPalm readers get informed
Oh no-its Christmas carol time. Damnit…
Foto%2815%29 Vienniese PUG met on the 6,1,2005 TamsPalm readers get informed
Swapping some programs. This is the best way to keep yourself current and productive-visit your local PUG!
Foto%2814%29 Vienniese PUG met on the 6,1,2005 TamsPalm readers get informed
A T3 and a TC exchanging data via IRDA. Bluetooth or WLAN could not be used, because the two handhelds did not have an equal transfer system…
Foto%2804%29 Vienniese PUG met on the 6,1,2005 TamsPalm readers get informed
The first victom of the day-Alex’s Tungsten C crashed. Luckily, unlike my T3 a few days before, a softreset fixed it…
Foto%2822%29 Vienniese PUG met on the 6,1,2005 TamsPalm readers get informed
Me and my T3, in the background our palm-user couple

When the Tungsten T5 hit the market, most commentators said that it was only a rebranded E2. However, the real E2 flashed up shortly at the American FCC web site for a few minutes. Thanks to Daves PDA Place, TamsPalm has a few images and a bit of technical data for you.
TamsPalm has not yet gotten any confirmed data about the handheld. All you see here is based solely on one source and my personal experience!
Here you can see the E2′s front and back:
The Tungsten E2 looks like the TE1
Another TE2 shot, viewable with graphical browsers.
Not much is known about the internal hardware or the OS version. I personally think that the processor and the memory amount will be more-less similar to the Zire 72-why should PalmOne reengineer the planar two times? To all OS freaks-forget OS6 on this one. If the OS will ever debut, it will IMHO(!!) debut on a flagship product, and not on a cheap, mid-class handheld!
However, the screen is said to have a color depth of 18 bit, finally getting back on par with Symbian and MDA handsets. While the difference is subtle and cannot really be seen, its good for the numbers…
However, when you look at the back of the unit, it looks like the connector has changed a little bit. It now should be compatible with the Treo series, so you will have to chuck away your old navigation equipment,…. . However, nothing is really known here yet!
The Tungsten TE2s backside sticker contains a Bluetooth and a SD logo
The shield you see here speaks a clear language-Bluetooth 1.1. This basically backs up my thesis about the Zire 72 planar being recycled here-anyway, its a nice feature for a mid-class PDA! If the SD slot has SDIO is not known yet, but since PalmOne will definitely want users to have WLAN(card purchase=extra income), it will probably be SDIO….
So, that’s a short round-up about the handheld. The device looks promising, although it will have a hard stand against PocketPC’s with their physically larger screens! Lets hope that PalmOne finally gets the quality control working…
I will comment further, as I get further information! Feel free to comment if you have a question or know something new!

Tapwave is considered the new Sony by many commentators. Indeed, their Zodiac handhelds deployed with fascinating new hardware-even the TE was endangered by the Z1-its darn cheap and still has a superb, large screen. The OS contains nifty hacks that let any other handheld look like a brick. ln addition, the second SD Card slot can get useful in some situations. The powerful graphic chip and processor can cook up graphics that beat the crap out of all Gameboys. A creative stereo speaker makes cool tunes, and the double battery gives stamina.
When this handheld was introduced, most commentators were sure that Tapwave hit the bull’s eye.
Indeed, the Zodiac is a superb gaming platform-but it is also a very performant PDA. And here is Tapwaves Achilles heel-they focus on the gaming part because they are alone in this sector. This strategy seems to work well for now, but I see a big dark cloud coming from Japan-its the Sony PSP. This system is said to be more-less compatible with stock playstation games(its just a recompile/media change-not even a real port) and thus will have access to literally thousands of famous games from experienced developers. Now compare that to the few PC ports/custom no-name games(Command and Conquer is more famous than Warfare Inc.) for the Zod. Looks like real trouble straight ahead-if Tapwave keeps focussing on the gaming sector only.
Now, lets forget the gaming part for a minute. The Zod is a powerful handheld workstation that doubles as MP3 and Video Player. However, most users never hear about this special feature. The marketing focuses on the gaming part-and this definitely isn’t the way to go! If the ads would concentrate on stopping the Zodiac=Gameboy++ belief, the PSP could prepare for a bloody nose. Well, there’s no email client for it, and where’s the spreadsheet and photo viewer?
What do you think? Am I just talking rubbish? Or do you share my thoughts? Anonymous comments are allowed, so lets discuss!

Recently, 1src carried an interesting thread of a user asking about why discussion about the Zire series is so rare. He thought that the whole handheld series is very unpopular. However, when we look at PalmOnes press releases,.. we see that the Zire series sells well.

So, why is there so little discussion about this kind of handheld? A dificult question at first. Isn’t it like this:
Much Talk=Much sales

and vice versa? Looms sensible at first, but it isn’t! Why are there so many communities discussing the long-discontinued Apple Newton series? Actually, forum discussion can IMHO not be used as a measure of device popularity! Users who talk about their handhelds do not see them as usual tools(do you talk about your bread knife?). Forum visitors are power users, that find fun and enjoyment in doing more with their PDA then it can do when it comes out of the box.
Zire handhelds go for a less than 250$, the most even go for 100$ and have only the most purist features. When you look at the advertising slogans PalmOne uses for the Zire series(see this article for details of the PalmOne advertising), one clearly see that they are advertised as an all-in-one effortless solution for users who do not know much about computers. They are intended for use as tools-the users use whats packaged and thats it! Some users treat these just as a replacement for the filofax-not grasping the idea of expansion/extension of possibilities.

Now, think about the statement made above. Will such a user want to discuss about extension possibilities, additional features or even peripherals that cost him extra money? The answer is simple and short-No. The users have their Zire handhelds in their suitcases and bags, and treat them as a stock filofax. Nobody discusses his datebook/address book, so why discuss the Zire…
What do you think about this topic?

We all know Mike Cane, and most of us share a strange dislike for him(not me though). Well, the poor guy wrote an editorial with PalmInfoCenter-and he immediately got a nice flogging. Serves him right, doesnt it?
Actually, it does not serve him right. Altough he chose an extremely provoking title-nobody does like beeing called a sucker- and made a few big mistakes comparing kernel and API, two of his core statements are sensible.

Lets start with him stating that OSses shall soon be interchangeable. While this definitely wasn’t true a few years ago, the Palm OS nowadays runs on ARM processors. Same architecture like PocketPC, Symbian, Linux and a load of other OSses. Lets face it-my stock Siemens SX1 almost equals a Tungsten T without touchscreen(OMAP CPU, 4MB of RAM, pretty big screen(higher resolution than Zire 31),bluetooth, MMC-Slot,…) . And a standard PPC is more-less a Palm OS handheld with more ROM and a different screen format!
A german reviewer(I know him as a trustable source) even found out that the T3 was produced with ASUS-a company that is known for a huge selection of PocketPCs. I think that the dominant question in the following years will be: Touchscreen?

Next thing:
Mike thinks that PalmSource will soon start porting the core Palm OS PIM apps to other platforms. Many commentators thought that a suite of Date Book, To Do, Address Book and Memo Pad would have no chance on the market. However-lets face it. What is Outlook? It is essentially the same thing bundled with a decent email client. If you think that Microsoft should stop developing Outlook, come on and mail’em! See what they answer you, it will be funny for sure!
What do you think about my statements?
P.s. Thanks to Steven Fisher for pointing out the thing with the API!

© 2012 TamsPalm - the Palm OS / web OS Blog Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha