<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PalmPi &#8211; CPUburn and benchmark for Palm OS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2006/01/06/palmpi-cpuburn-and-benchmark-for-palm-os/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2006/01/06/palmpi-cpuburn-and-benchmark-for-palm-os/</link>
	<description>Palm OS / web OS news and opinion source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:33:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2006/01/06/palmpi-cpuburn-and-benchmark-for-palm-os/comment-page-1/#comment-242306</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 20:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/?p=171#comment-242306</guid>
		<description>Hello,

After years of waiting ;-) here the 
Zire 22 : 4,54s
Zire 71 : 8,85s
T5 : 2,75s (confirmation)
Tungsten C : 2,93s
LifeDrive : 2,77s
Tx : 3,67s but 1,84s with Pxaclocker (sys and bus 208, turbo sys x3)
With PXAclocker I can go to +- 2 seconds or even less with the Tungsten C, T5, Tx (the best overclocking I have surprisingly encountered). LifeDrive probably permits good overclocking, but not tested yet. Thanks for this little utilitary who does very good the job it is aim for : to know how fast is your Palm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>After years of waiting <img src='http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  here the<br />
Zire 22 : 4,54s<br />
Zire 71 : 8,85s<br />
T5 : 2,75s (confirmation)<br />
Tungsten C : 2,93s<br />
LifeDrive : 2,77s<br />
Tx : 3,67s but 1,84s with Pxaclocker (sys and bus 208, turbo sys x3)<br />
With PXAclocker I can go to +- 2 seconds or even less with the Tungsten C, T5, Tx (the best overclocking I have surprisingly encountered). LifeDrive probably permits good overclocking, but not tested yet. Thanks for this little utilitary who does very good the job it is aim for : to know how fast is your Palm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nowshining</title>
		<link>http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2006/01/06/palmpi-cpuburn-and-benchmark-for-palm-os/comment-page-1/#comment-195277</link>
		<dc:creator>nowshining</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 01:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/?p=171#comment-195277</guid>
		<description>oh crud - Afterburner is Set to 28mhz. Okay i&#039;m done now. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh crud &#8211; Afterburner is Set to 28mhz. Okay i&#8217;m done now. <img src='http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nowshining</title>
		<link>http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2006/01/06/palmpi-cpuburn-and-benchmark-for-palm-os/comment-page-1/#comment-195276</link>
		<dc:creator>Nowshining</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 01:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/?p=171#comment-195276</guid>
		<description>oh yeah forgot to add that I tested it about 3 times or so and it came out all the same. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh yeah forgot to add that I tested it about 3 times or so and it came out all the same. <img src='http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nowshining</title>
		<link>http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2006/01/06/palmpi-cpuburn-and-benchmark-for-palm-os/comment-page-1/#comment-195275</link>
		<dc:creator>Nowshining</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 01:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/?p=171#comment-195275</guid>
		<description>MY Palm IIIxe with My overclock Settings(Afterburner) With OS 4.1 and Speedups with Quickbits - comes to: 12.9 Seconds

:)

I did use the Updated Versions 0.2b from http://www.freewarepalm.com/calculator/palmpi.shtml

And wowee 12.9 faster than a IIIc and V

and if  Bullitt&#039;s post says that a 

Clie SL10: 12.94 s
[HiRes, 33MHz DragonBall SuperVZ] is as u see 12.94 and mines 12.9 - a bit faster than well I&#039;m concluding that will the things I used it&#039;s roughly a bit over 33mhz. 

Yes My IIIxe is Quite Stable with these settings. :) Esp. After getting rid of Bad Programs that caused resets, etc.. :)


:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MY Palm IIIxe with My overclock Settings(Afterburner) With OS 4.1 and Speedups with Quickbits &#8211; comes to: 12.9 Seconds</p>
<p> <img src='http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I did use the Updated Versions 0.2b from <a href="http://www.freewarepalm.com/calculator/palmpi.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.freewarepalm.com/calculator/palmpi.shtml</a></p>
<p>And wowee 12.9 faster than a IIIc and V</p>
<p>and if  Bullitt&#8217;s post says that a </p>
<p>Clie SL10: 12.94 s<br />
[HiRes, 33MHz DragonBall SuperVZ] is as u see 12.94 and mines 12.9 &#8211; a bit faster than well I&#8217;m concluding that will the things I used it&#8217;s roughly a bit over 33mhz. </p>
<p>Yes My IIIxe is Quite Stable with these settings. <img src='http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Esp. After getting rid of Bad Programs that caused resets, etc.. <img src='http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p> <img src='http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2006/01/06/palmpi-cpuburn-and-benchmark-for-palm-os/comment-page-1/#comment-130030</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 05:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/?p=171#comment-130030</guid>
		<description>Palm Tungsten T2: 9.39 secs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Palm Tungsten T2: 9.39 secs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2006/01/06/palmpi-cpuburn-and-benchmark-for-palm-os/comment-page-1/#comment-110609</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 12:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/?p=171#comment-110609</guid>
		<description>And what about Zire22? Does anyone have results pls.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what about Zire22? Does anyone have results pls.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francisco</title>
		<link>http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2006/01/06/palmpi-cpuburn-and-benchmark-for-palm-os/comment-page-1/#comment-110476</link>
		<dc:creator>Francisco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 09:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/?p=171#comment-110476</guid>
		<description>Hello,
My Palm Tungsten E takes 9.75 sec. for the benchmark at the default processor freq (252/2). After overcloking it to 372/2 it gives me 6.38 sec. 
At the maximum working overclok frequency (192/1) it gives me 6.2 sec.

Best Regards

Francisco</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
My Palm Tungsten E takes 9.75 sec. for the benchmark at the default processor freq (252/2). After overcloking it to 372/2 it gives me 6.38 sec.<br />
At the maximum working overclok frequency (192/1) it gives me 6.2 sec.</p>
<p>Best Regards</p>
<p>Francisco</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ancer</title>
		<link>http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2006/01/06/palmpi-cpuburn-and-benchmark-for-palm-os/comment-page-1/#comment-106738</link>
		<dc:creator>ancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 13:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/?p=171#comment-106738</guid>
		<description>Hi,

PalmPi:
Sony Clié PEG-NX70V/U	 5.74 sec
Sony Clié PEG-T675C	 6.63 sec
Sony Clié PEG-NR70V/E	 6.67 sec
Sony Clié PEG-SJ30/E	12.49 sec
Handspring Visor Neo	15.81 sec

Best regards
ancer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>PalmPi:<br />
Sony Clié PEG-NX70V/U	 5.74 sec<br />
Sony Clié PEG-T675C	 6.63 sec<br />
Sony Clié PEG-NR70V/E	 6.67 sec<br />
Sony Clié PEG-SJ30/E	12.49 sec<br />
Handspring Visor Neo	15.81 sec</p>
<p>Best regards<br />
ancer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bullitt</title>
		<link>http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2006/01/06/palmpi-cpuburn-and-benchmark-for-palm-os/comment-page-1/#comment-41705</link>
		<dc:creator>Bullitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/?p=171#comment-41705</guid>
		<description>you&#039;re welcome!

Just for your information PalmPi is still available and actually at 0.2b, get it here www.freewarepalm.com/calculator/palmpi.shtml
(I hope there will be no problem for posting 7.8the site !?)

Also i&#039;ve done 3 more Benches:

Clie TJ37: 4.75
this one&#039;s representative for the hole TJ-Series, because they have the same CPU !

Palm m125: 15.51 s
[LoRes, 33MHz DragonBall VZ]

Clie SL10: 12.94 s 
[HiRes, 33MHz DragonBall SuperVZ]

In the last 2 measurements you can nicely see the difference between Motorola Dragonball VZ and SuperVZ Processors ! Maybe the SL10 could have better results, if it had a LoRes Screen.

best wishes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you&#8217;re welcome!</p>
<p>Just for your information PalmPi is still available and actually at 0.2b, get it here <a href="http://www.freewarepalm.com/calculator/palmpi.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.freewarepalm.com/calculator/palmpi.shtml</a><br />
(I hope there will be no problem for posting 7.8the site !?)</p>
<p>Also i&#8217;ve done 3 more Benches:</p>
<p>Clie TJ37: 4.75<br />
this one&#8217;s representative for the hole TJ-Series, because they have the same CPU !</p>
<p>Palm m125: 15.51 s<br />
[LoRes, 33MHz DragonBall VZ]</p>
<p>Clie SL10: 12.94 s<br />
[HiRes, 33MHz DragonBall SuperVZ]</p>
<p>In the last 2 measurements you can nicely see the difference between Motorola Dragonball VZ and SuperVZ Processors ! Maybe the SL10 could have better results, if it had a LoRes Screen.</p>
<p>best wishes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tam Hanna</title>
		<link>http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2006/01/06/palmpi-cpuburn-and-benchmark-for-palm-os/comment-page-1/#comment-41568</link>
		<dc:creator>Tam Hanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/?p=171#comment-41568</guid>
		<description>Hi,
thank you very much!

Best regards
Tam Hanna</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
thank you very much!</p>
<p>Best regards<br />
Tam Hanna</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.148 seconds -->

