<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AcidImage-the review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2006/03/15/acidimage-the-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2006/03/15/acidimage-the-review/</link>
	<description>Palm OS / web OS news and opinion source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:47:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2006/03/15/acidimage-the-review/comment-page-1/#comment-705</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 17:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/?p=442#comment-705</guid>
		<description>Hi edwin,
once you manage to get used to the interface, it indeed is. The decoding works flawlessly, et al. 

I currently test other image viewers that sometimes even have a better UI-but overall, AcidImage still looks pretty good because of the flawless decoding and the resizer,...

Best regards
Tam Hanna</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi edwin,<br />
once you manage to get used to the interface, it indeed is. The decoding works flawlessly, et al. </p>
<p>I currently test other image viewers that sometimes even have a better UI-but overall, AcidImage still looks pretty good because of the flawless decoding and the resizer,&#8230;</p>
<p>Best regards<br />
Tam Hanna</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EDwin</title>
		<link>http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2006/03/15/acidimage-the-review/comment-page-1/#comment-702</link>
		<dc:creator>EDwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 08:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/?p=442#comment-702</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using AcidImage for years now and I still think it&#039;s a fast no-nonsense image viewer. Just copy your photos to your memorycard, use normal PC-directorys to group them and you can find all your photos in a few seconds. Perfect.
I also have a licence for SplashPhoto but the last time I&#039;ve used it it didn&#039;t work with directorys, all photos in one map, very messy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using AcidImage for years now and I still think it&#8217;s a fast no-nonsense image viewer. Just copy your photos to your memorycard, use normal PC-directorys to group them and you can find all your photos in a few seconds. Perfect.<br />
I also have a licence for SplashPhoto but the last time I&#8217;ve used it it didn&#8217;t work with directorys, all photos in one map, very messy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
