<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The latest Binary Clock banner ad &#8211; totally different</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2006/11/07/the-latest-binary-clock-banner-ad-totally-different/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2006/11/07/the-latest-binary-clock-banner-ad-totally-different/</link>
	<description>Palm OS / web OS news and opinion source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:35:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sol</title>
		<link>http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2006/11/07/the-latest-binary-clock-banner-ad-totally-different/comment-page-1/#comment-24665</link>
		<dc:creator>Sol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2006/11/07/the-latest-binary-clock-banner-ad-totally-different/#comment-24665</guid>
		<description>Speaking as someone who has a binary clock sitting on top of his monitor, it seems to me the biggest problem with both ads is that you don&#039;t see the clock working.  If you didn&#039;t already know how they work, neither ad does anything to show you how nifty they are.

Seems to me that in the ideal world, a good ad would be one like the second one, but with a working binary clock giving you the correct time in the lower right corner....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking as someone who has a binary clock sitting on top of his monitor, it seems to me the biggest problem with both ads is that you don&#8217;t see the clock working.  If you didn&#8217;t already know how they work, neither ad does anything to show you how nifty they are.</p>
<p>Seems to me that in the ideal world, a good ad would be one like the second one, but with a working binary clock giving you the correct time in the lower right corner&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snark</title>
		<link>http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2006/11/07/the-latest-binary-clock-banner-ad-totally-different/comment-page-1/#comment-23473</link>
		<dc:creator>Snark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 12:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2006/11/07/the-latest-binary-clock-banner-ad-totally-different/#comment-23473</guid>
		<description>Typo:

It&#039;s time for a new kind of clock

But I have unfortunately to agree with LTH on the limited usefulness of this kind of program. When I want to read the time, it has to be quick. I don&#039;t want to have to do binary conversions in my head (OK, I guess this improves over time, but it&#039;s still something to learn).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typo:</p>
<p>It&#8217;s time for a new kind of clock</p>
<p>But I have unfortunately to agree with LTH on the limited usefulness of this kind of program. When I want to read the time, it has to be quick. I don&#8217;t want to have to do binary conversions in my head (OK, I guess this improves over time, but it&#8217;s still something to learn).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tam Hanna</title>
		<link>http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2006/11/07/the-latest-binary-clock-banner-ad-totally-different/comment-page-1/#comment-23310</link>
		<dc:creator>Tam Hanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 09:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2006/11/07/the-latest-binary-clock-banner-ad-totally-different/#comment-23310</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I know that Binary Clock has rather limited appeal. Well have new banners soon - but nevertheless, I felt like sharing the idea!

Best regards
Tam Hanna</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I know that Binary Clock has rather limited appeal. Well have new banners soon &#8211; but nevertheless, I felt like sharing the idea!</p>
<p>Best regards<br />
Tam Hanna</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LTH</title>
		<link>http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2006/11/07/the-latest-binary-clock-banner-ad-totally-different/comment-page-1/#comment-23283</link>
		<dc:creator>LTH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 06:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2006/11/07/the-latest-binary-clock-banner-ad-totally-different/#comment-23283</guid>
		<description>IMHO the ad is not the problem, the problem is the binary clock concept itself which is very far to be popular, even among geeks.
Even internet time by swatch was not a success...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO the ad is not the problem, the problem is the binary clock concept itself which is very far to be popular, even among geeks.<br />
Even internet time by swatch was not a success&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
