<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Palm OS 2 delayed even more</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2008/08/21/palm-os-2-delayed-even-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2008/08/21/palm-os-2-delayed-even-more/</link>
	<description>Palm OS / web OS news and opinion source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:33:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tam Hanna, Site Founder</title>
		<link>http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2008/08/21/palm-os-2-delayed-even-more/comment-page-1/#comment-234359</link>
		<dc:creator>Tam Hanna, Site Founder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/?p=2942#comment-234359</guid>
		<description>Hi Folks,
being perfectly honest, I tend to side with INION here. Actually, I think that its already too late for Palm in regards to Nova...developers are way too miffed due to the Cobalt and Foleo debacles...

All the best
Tam Hanna</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Folks,<br />
being perfectly honest, I tend to side with INION here. Actually, I think that its already too late for Palm in regards to Nova&#8230;developers are way too miffed due to the Cobalt and Foleo debacles&#8230;</p>
<p>All the best<br />
Tam Hanna</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: INION</title>
		<link>http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2008/08/21/palm-os-2-delayed-even-more/comment-page-1/#comment-234358</link>
		<dc:creator>INION</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/?p=2942#comment-234358</guid>
		<description>I think that, given the innumerable delays and false starts we&#039;ve seen in any type of Garnet successor, further delay in POS II deployment is very plausible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that, given the innumerable delays and false starts we&#8217;ve seen in any type of Garnet successor, further delay in POS II deployment is very plausible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Palmdoc</title>
		<link>http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2008/08/21/palm-os-2-delayed-even-more/comment-page-1/#comment-234353</link>
		<dc:creator>Palmdoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 01:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/?p=2942#comment-234353</guid>
		<description>Why are we jumping  to conclusions here? The article merely said &quot;first half of next year&quot;. True that is a wider time frame but that means a March 2009 release is still possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are we jumping  to conclusions here? The article merely said &#8220;first half of next year&#8221;. True that is a wider time frame but that means a March 2009 release is still possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.112 seconds -->

