<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Palm: we are willing to license webOS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2009/06/27/palm-we-are-willing-to-license-webos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2009/06/27/palm-we-are-willing-to-license-webos/</link>
	<description>Palm OS / web OS news and opinion source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:33:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: medevilenemy</title>
		<link>http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2009/06/27/palm-we-are-willing-to-license-webos/comment-page-1/#comment-236784</link>
		<dc:creator>medevilenemy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 17:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/?p=4713#comment-236784</guid>
		<description>Now that is an interesting thought.  People have already been toying with the idea of palm building a netbook.  I wonder if they could pull it off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that is an interesting thought.  People have already been toying with the idea of palm building a netbook.  I wonder if they could pull it off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philpalm</title>
		<link>http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2009/06/27/palm-we-are-willing-to-license-webos/comment-page-1/#comment-236777</link>
		<dc:creator>philpalm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 11:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/?p=4713#comment-236777</guid>
		<description>The starting of Handspring comes to mind as an example where Palm allowed someone to license their product. I don&#039;t think there would be a splinter group from Palm but maybe for a netbook instead for a PDA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The starting of Handspring comes to mind as an example where Palm allowed someone to license their product. I don&#8217;t think there would be a splinter group from Palm but maybe for a netbook instead for a PDA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: medevilenemy</title>
		<link>http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2009/06/27/palm-we-are-willing-to-license-webos/comment-page-1/#comment-236772</link>
		<dc:creator>medevilenemy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 23:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/?p=4713#comment-236772</guid>
		<description>But don&#039;t forget... Colligan was mildly idiotic.  However, licensing would indeed be a double edged sword.  The smartphone market isn&#039;t as &quot;open&quot; as the handheld market was... It at least appears as if there is less space for more competitors.  While licensing would probably bring in large amounts of &quot;free&quot; profit, it would come at the cost of limiting their own market penetration which could be problematic this time around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But don&#8217;t forget&#8230; Colligan was mildly idiotic.  However, licensing would indeed be a double edged sword.  The smartphone market isn&#8217;t as &#8220;open&#8221; as the handheld market was&#8230; It at least appears as if there is less space for more competitors.  While licensing would probably bring in large amounts of &#8220;free&#8221; profit, it would come at the cost of limiting their own market penetration which could be problematic this time around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.140 seconds -->

